:
to India Munds, especiall faris forth, thes Munts may be requirid You
Shark &
sundutake
the comage of rupees. Trang case it seems doubtful whether the advantage of some small dege of greater regulents in the suffet would compensate for the extra cost which the
figures quoted above
show would be
möolved in the
proposed change.
132
DOMESTIC.
C.O.
I am
not satisfied that
e or Individual.
Agents
1900
Heb
previous Paper.
bo py
Ence for 39:9 Zeb
Arad & Jel
76~1350007-12-96
5-15-11-0
subsequent Paper.
bb78
79.00
No. 4164
(Subject.)
New Law Court's
4167
RECO
A
Pro 7 FEB X
X0
sende copy Architect's letter reap the
proposed reversal of the holdings:
My Lunas.
Deze graph to former
Dazzleape
Referring to
your despatch
obliquity
(Minutes.)
Sent. 44.30pm.
NOT
ATA
8/2
Sno
Exorcisms bemoisten
datolite
368 foundations may be procceded with. Duspatite follows by mail!"
I send facinor by next mail copy
Ar
of draft
3207 & of Evclosure in this eather, leaving it to him to decide whether position of buildings should be revised & requesting him to telegraph, what densing The adopts for conceeniication to consulting enfineds!
infound whey of despatch &.C.A.
It will be seen that in Whin thead in this latter
of ember 766 criticizes this question of that frames
suber
Sw. y. 8/2.
of the Law counts & also criticizes the general te after design. We cound compare his photoproles with the architects desifu, hause it want the Setches in original to firemor in 25-382.
C.PL.8
at once
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.